Wednesday, September 24, 2014

TimberGiant's "Big Red" Just a Person in a Suit??

By
Timbergiantbigfoot has some interesting yet controversial videos. His claim to fame is definitely his Sasquatch Observed in the Forest video featuring "Big Red." Much speculation has gone on over this piece of footage. Some have said that what he filmed is actually just a bear, others say it is a large dog, while many say it is definitely a hoax. And of course you have those who think it is a real, live Bigfoot.

The problem many people have is that the guy always seems to have activity. Antonio from Facebook says "easy give away, no one person could possibly have as many video's of BF....simple. If it was that easy we would see hundreds of thousands of them, just another hoaxer." 


TGBF is from Ontario, Canada. My sources (Bigfoot researchers from his area) have recognized things in his videos and say he films his videos at the Dundas Valley Conservation Park. This is a park in southern Ontario where there are no bears. It is also in a very urban area so I would suspect there are no Bigfoots there either. The park is littered with trails and is highly used by bikers and walkers. Apparently he is now going somewhere near Walkerton, Ontario to "research."  Here is a screenshot that was taken from his video of Big Red. Could it just be a person in a bear costume? I always thought the folds on the alleged creature were suspect.

Thanks to some folks over in the Coalition for Reason, Science, Sanity in Bigfoot Research Facebook group for the following screen-shot and picture.


Notice the excess fur/fabric in the neck area of image #1. This is what I'm seeing in the video.


This is the area that he is reported to research at. Click on the map to go to Google maps.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Dundas+Valley+Conservation+Area/@43.1931127,-79.9724248,12z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x0:0x3a19ac2fb4c4c2ac 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

10 comments:

  1. I agree the amount of activity in itself is suspicious. ThinkerThunker, who has looked at this particular video on Youtube, comes to the conclusion that it is more likely that TGBF is documenting real activity due to the amount of time and effort he has put in. I think that reasoning is very faulty as hoaxers have already shown that they will go to some pretty great lengths to pry their craft.

    If the area that he films in is indeed DVCA, the case against him is just that more damning. It is extremely difficult to believe that the area would support anything like the success he has had.

    ReplyDelete
  2. He's not down by Hamilton. He's more towards Walkerton and Owen Sound. The Saugeen River was mentioned at one point in his comments by somebody he knows.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well someone must know this guy, where he lives, the park/forest he visits. People must have seen him biking, walking the trails as they are well used from the look of it. Keep the information coming.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Its pretty obvious it's a well used park in an urban area. What he claims are animal trails are paths made by people, in fact there are people walking dogs/off road bikes/trash trucks etc in a lot of his videos. Plus the fact he turns up in flip-flops shows he isn't going far to get there :) So many gullible people tend to turn a blind eye to these facts and follow him like sheep.

    ReplyDelete
  5. There actualy have been sightings near that area but not since the seventies when human population was considerably lower. I think hes making this shit up.

    ReplyDelete
  6. He has never claimed he follows animal trails, and openly says people and ATVs travel that path. Why is everyone trashing him? Give me PROOF he is hoaxing, and I will help do the trashing. IF he's hoaxing, it will surface in time. Until then, I'm going to watch his videos and form my own opinion. He has never said WHERE he researches, and it's incongruous of us to speculate.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I see four pics of costumes and TGBF's pic. I'm not saying your wrong but I see no evidence of a debunk. I appreciate your opinion, but I'm not seeing your point. If you see wrinkles, so what? I still see no reason to doubt TT's analysis of the three individuals in the video.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How can you call what he does "research"...he walks thru the woods and takes videos...but he is cashing in on his nice guy image with a pay pal account that you can contribute to...for what? new crock's? He is riding a new bike however, he can never focus his camera. He says "there is a lot of prints here" but rarely shows them or casts them...he has figured out how to turn his nice guy persona into a business. He has enough gullible followers that if you question him about filming a snow mound and saying "I'm not sure what that is, it could be something"...you get lambasted by his fans. He went back the next day to re-film the snow mound, mystery solved...but the 2 videos were worth 8,000 views....chaching...chaching...$$$$

    ReplyDelete
  9. 44:55 of "The Giant Revealed , Narrated , with The Missing Clips" tells me all I need to know. It's a dude (you can even see part of his face when he sits up) facing the bottom right corner of your screen holding a smaller person, who has his/her left arm around the right (his right) side of the dude's neck. You can see the man's right arm/hand (right under the stripe) lose contact & move up the smaller person's lower back.Also, notice the difference in the "stripe(s). That means the dude was facing our left @ 35:00 & our right @ 45:00. BF is real, just not THIS one.

    ReplyDelete
  10. 100% hoax...i challenge ANYBODY to say otherwise. its a dude sitting down w/ another smaller person straddling him. Heads don't ripple/change shape people! & this one has a nice fore arm running through it!

    ReplyDelete